Backlog maintenance is a critical issue that affects the operational efficiency, safety, and financial health of the NHS. However, engaging Executive directors—who are primarily focused on strategic, high-level decisions—can be challenging. To effectively bring the issue of backlog maintenance to their attention, it is crucial to frame the discussion in a way that aligns with their priorities and demonstrates clear system value.
This position paper explores strategies to engage executives on the issue of backlog maintenance. It emphasises the importance of understanding their perspective, presenting a compelling case supported by data, and proposing actionable solutions that align with patient focused goals.
Understanding the Executive Perspective
To effectively engage Executive directors, it is essential to first understand their priorities and the lens through which they view organisational issues. Executive, such as the CEO, CFO, COO, and CPO, are primarily concerned with the Trust’s overall performance, competitive positioning, risk management, and patient safety. They are less interested in the technical details of operations unless those details have a direct and significant impact on strategic outcomes.
Executives are driven by strategic goals, such as patient safety, cost reduction, service expansion, and innovation. Maintenance issues must be framed in a way that shows a direct correlation with these priorities. They are always looking for ways to enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs. Backlog maintenance often represents inefficiency and hidden costs; thus, addressing it can be positioned to unlock potential savings and optimise resource allocation.
The executive team are highly focused on identifying and mitigating risks that could threaten the operational, reputational, and financial stability of the Trust. Presenting backlog maintenance as a risk management issue—one that could lead to equipment failures, safety incidents, or regulatory fines—can resonate strongly with this audience. Compliance with regulatory standards and maintaining safety are non-negotiable priorities. Highlighting how backlog maintenance can compromise these areas can be a powerful motivator for action.
Presenting a Compelling Case
To capture the attention of Executive directors, it is important to present a compelling, data-driven case that clearly illustrates the impact of backlog maintenance on the organisation. This involves using relevant metrics, highlighting risks, and demonstrating potential financial implications. Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as the number of overdue maintenance tasks, average downtime, maintenance costs, and equipment failure rates can paint a clear picture of the scale of the issue. Where possible, translate these metrics into financial terms, such as lost beds, increased operational costs, or potential fines for non-compliance.
The risks associated with backlog maintenance, including increased likelihood of equipment failure, safety hazards, reduced asset life, and potential regulatory breaches should be highlighted. The use of scenarios or case studies to illustrate worst-case outcomes and the potential financial and reputational damage to the NHS is recommended.
To gain buy-in, it is crucial to show that addressing backlog maintenance will lead to a positive return on investment. Presenting a cost-benefit analysis that compares the costs of clearing the maintenance backlog with the savings from reduced downtime, lower repair costs, improved asset performance, and extended equipment lifespan is key. Highlighting any quick wins that can be achieved with minimal investment will build momentum and confidence.
Any director of estates needs to show how the organisation compares with NHS benchmarks. Using Model Hospital to highlight that the Trust lags behind peers in maintenance efficiency can create a sense of urgency and the need for action. Conversely, showcasing successful examples from other Trust can provide a roadmap for potential solutions and outcomes.
Speaking the Executive’s Language
Effective communication is key when engaging Executive directors. This involves using language and framing that resonate with their interests and concerns, avoiding technical jargon, and focusing on strategic outcomes. Frame the issue of backlog maintenance in terms of strategic outcomes that matter to the Executive. For example, instead of discussing specific maintenance tasks, emphasise how addressing the backlog will improve overall operational reliability, enhance patient experience, reduce capacity downtime, and protect the Trust’s reputation.
Executive are bombarded with information and have limited time. Present your case succinctly, using clear and concise language. Use visuals, such as charts and graphs, to quickly convey key points and make the data more digestible. Different Executive members have different concerns. For instance, the CFO will be particularly interested in the financial implications, the COO will focus on operational impacts, and the CPO might be more concerned with the working environment aspects of maintenance. Tailor your message to address the specific interests of each executive.
Proposing Strategic Solutions
Once you have captured the attention of the Executive, the next step is to propose actionable solutions that align with the Trust’s strategic objectives. This involves presenting a clear plan, outlining the required resources, and demonstrating how the proposed actions will address the backlog and deliver value. Provide a roadmap for addressing backlog maintenance, with clear steps, timelines, and resource requirements. Offer options that allow for phased implementation, so the organisation can start small and scale up based on early successes. This reduces the perceived risk and makes it easier for the Executive to commit.
Wherever possible, link the proposed maintenance strategies with broader Trust priorities, such as digital transformation, sustainability, or cost reduction programs. For example, incorporating predictive maintenance technologies can be framed as part of a digital innovation strategy, while improved maintenance practices can contribute to sustainability goals by extending asset life and reducing waste.
Highlight how leveraging new technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, machine learning, or advanced analytics, can transform maintenance from a reactive to a proactive function. Demonstrating that backlog maintenance can be reduced through innovation can make the proposal more attractive.
Engaging other departments, such as finance, operations, and IT, can help build a coalition of support. This cross-functional approach not only strengthens the case but also demonstrates that the proposed solutions are well-rounded and consider the needs and constraints of various parts of the Trust.
Addressing Potential Objections
Executives are likely to have questions and concerns about the proposed solutions. Anticipating these objections and being prepared with thoughtful responses can help overcome resistance and secure buy-in. One of the most common objections is related to budget. To address this, present a phased approach that spreads costs over time and highlights quick wins that can offset initial expenses. Also, emphasise the long-term savings and ROI to demonstrate that the investment is worthwhile.
Executives often face multiple, competing priorities. Position backlog maintenance as a foundational issue that, if left unaddressed, could undermine other strategic initiatives. For example, if the trust is focused on reducing waiting lists, highlight how unreliable equipment due to maintenance backlogs could jeopardise these efforts. Resistance to change can be another barrier. Show that the proposed solutions include robust change management support, such as training, clear communication, and gradual implementation. Highlight how addressing maintenance backlogs can lead to a more efficient workforce, with less fire-fighting.
Keeping the Issue Visible
Securing initial buy-in from the Executive is only the first step. To ensure sustained attention and action, it is important to keep the issue of backlog maintenance visible at the executive level. Provide regular updates on the progress of maintenance initiatives, highlighting successes, challenges, and adjustments. Use dashboards and concise reports that align with the Executive’s preference for high-level, visual summaries.
Recognise and celebrate milestones and successes, both big and small. This not only keeps momentum but also reinforces the value of the initiative and maintains executive interest. However, be prepared to adapt the strategy based on feedback and results. Show a willingness to pivot if necessary and keep the focus on continuous improvement. This demonstrates that the initiative is dynamic and responsive to the trust’s evolving needs.
You will need to ensure that maintenance remains a topic in ongoing strategic discussions. For example, link maintenance progress to broader trust reviews or strategy sessions. This helps maintain its relevance and reinforces the connection between maintenance and overall business performance.
Conclusion
Engaging Executive directors on the issue of backlog maintenance requires a strategic approach that aligns maintenance concerns with the broader business objectives of the NHS organisations. By understanding the Executive’s priorities, presenting a compelling case with clear data and metrics, and proposing actionable solutions that demonstrate ROI, it is possible to elevate the issue of backlog maintenance to the strategic level it deserves.
Effective communication, leveraging success stories, and maintaining ongoing visibility are key components of this engagement strategy. By positioning backlog maintenance not just as an operational necessity but as a strategic opportunity, trusts can secure the support of their highest leaders and drive meaningful improvements in operational efficiency, risk management, and financial performance.
Comments